Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes T-8507, March 14, 1937
Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes T-8507, March 15, 1937
Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes T-8507, March 15, 1937
Seam Racer has a nice post about these here.
I haven't found anything more. They were offered from 1927 through 1941 and were aimed at young adult women.
Announcement, December 1936
Campus Modes T-8502, February 07, 1936
Instagram has changed how it uses hashtags and it’s making me pull my hair. The IG will continue but there is now also a Facebook page, which I hope will give me a little more flexibility.
I’m going to start out by apologizing for getting all soapboxy today, but something came up on one of my FB vintage pattern groups and for the sake of all of our sanities, I would like to say a piece about it.
“Women were smaller then.”
“I don’t have a 1940s figure.”
“People were built differently.”
Etc.
Humans may have been smaller/thinner on average, but they certainly weren’t all smaller or thinner. You do have a 1940s figure, you just aren’t wearing a 1940s girdle. People were not built differently.
The women featured in clothing ads and sewing books were models. They were selected for their figures to present clothing as appealingly as possible. Then, as now, they were the exception.
Remember, though, that sewing patterns are, of necessity, drafted to averaged measurements. They cannot fit every figure perfectly right out of the packet. The whole reason those sewing books exist is because so many women didn’t, and don’t, have the median figure and needed to alter their sewing patterns to fit. If everyone had looked like that, there would have been no need for those books.
Please, please, go through your family albums and pictures of non-model women online and observe all the shapes and sizes; big hips and thick middles; short legs, broad shoulders, and flat chests; plus sizes and hollow chests, and be kind to yourself.
This year worked out pretty well. I can't find 8929 and I'm not sure about some of the 1400 series patterns, but it's pretty complete.
This year was a mess--I'm not sure what was going on with the numbering, but I scooped all I could find.
I got an inquiry recently about Anne Adams 4865--the 1948 version--so here are all of them that I could find. This really shows you why da...