These don't seem to have pattern numbers, or maybe you had to send in to get the catalog to find out what the numbers were. Here are a jacket, morning jacket, and shirtwaist (blouse, often with tailored or menswear-inspired styling, as opposed to something really blousy and frilly) from 1901.
Vintage Pattern Dating Project
Tuesday, April 7, 2026
Friday, April 3, 2026
Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes T-8509, T-8510, and T-8511
Campus Modes T-8509, March 1937. The peaked sleeves are a very 1930s detail.
Campus Modes T-8510, ad from July but probably released in late March, 1937. I like the depiction of a fun nautical print.
Campus Modes T-8511, April 04, 1937, evening gown.
Thursday, April 2, 2026
Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes T-8506, T-8507, and T-8508
Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes T-8507, March 14, 1937
Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes T-8507, March 15, 1937
Wednesday, April 1, 2026
Carolyn Ramey Campus Modes patterns
Seam Racer has a nice post about these here.
I haven't found anything more. They were offered from 1927 through 1941 and were aimed at young adult women.
Announcement, December 1936
I have not found a T-8500, if there was one. Here is Campus Modes T-8501 from January 1937
Campus Modes T-8502, February 07, 1936
Campus Modes T-8503, February 14, 1936
Campus Modes T-8504, February 21, 1936
Campus Modes T-8505, ad dated September 09 but was probably released in early March
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
New Facebook page
Instagram has changed how it uses hashtags and it’s making me pull my hair. The IG will continue but there is now also a Facebook page, which I hope will give me a little more flexibility.
Thursday, November 13, 2025
Friday, October 17, 2025
A note on "vintage bodies"
I’m going to start out by apologizing for getting all soapboxy today, but something came up on one of my FB vintage pattern groups and for the sake of all of our sanities, I would like to say a piece about it.
“Women were smaller then.”
“I don’t have a 1940s figure.”
“People were built differently.”
Etc.
Humans may have been smaller/thinner on average, but they certainly weren’t all smaller or thinner. You do have a 1940s figure, you just aren’t wearing a 1940s girdle. People were not built differently.
The women featured in clothing ads and sewing books were models. They were selected for their figures to present clothing as appealingly as possible. Then, as now, they were the exception.
Remember, though, that sewing patterns are, of necessity, drafted to averaged measurements. They cannot fit every figure perfectly right out of the packet. The whole reason those sewing books exist is because so many women didn’t, and don’t, have the median figure and needed to alter their sewing patterns to fit. If everyone had looked like that, there would have been no need for those books.
Please, please, go through your family albums and pictures of non-model women online and observe all the shapes and sizes; big hips and thick middles; short legs, broad shoulders, and flat chests; plus sizes and hollow chests, and be kind to yourself.
May Manton, 1901
These don't seem to have pattern numbers, or maybe you had to send in to get the catalog to find out what the numbers were. Here are a...
-
This year worked out pretty well. I can't find 8929 and I'm not sure about some of the 1400 series patterns, but it's pretty c...
-
I’m going to start out by apologizing for getting all soapboxy today, but something came up on one of my FB vintage pattern groups a...



















